Sometimes you need to take a step back to take two forward. In the next iteration, developers need to try to create web2.5 products that are independent of market volatility and designed for both users familiar with crypto and for those who do not need it at all.

P2E is discredited, but it may become part of classic games, but it would be better to call it “open economy” as gamers once began to be attracted to “open world”

In such games, there should be a bridge between web2 and web3. Both technically and ideologically. And web3 players should be useful to web2 players and this benefit would bring profit to the developer in order to justify his costs for attracting crypto players. Think of it as a burn rate on the most dedicated players in the role of Evangelical Ambassadors. For example: Axie Infinity has a talking Nation concept

This nation is the very secret of axi infinity's success. People who create viral content and onboard other players. The mistake was that they attracted the same web3 players-businessmen, and not web2-consumers who are willing to spend money, making up for the net capital outflow

The same axes in the brand new game Axie Infinity: Origins will try to build an open economy into the classic game. The task is not trivial. Make an exciting game that will be played, and with a bridge to an open economy

A support group represented by crypto players will help them attract. Other games will follow the same path, and one of the most important competencies will be community building and the ability to delegate tasks to the community to build a community owned part of the game. And for this, the development team must have a crypto expert interacting with PM and CM, but about the vision of the organizational structure in the next. post. He wrote in detail about the future of crypto games there.